On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:30:26AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Paul W. Frields wrote: > > We should not make this effort without communicating with our > > compatriots in Red Hat Documentation. They moved to the OPL to match > > our requirements so it would only be fair to coordinate with them. > > IIRC this change was driven by Red Hat Legal. What does Red Hat legal > say now? As I said separately, the original drive was to match up with Red Hat's licensing. Spot said RHT Legal would prefer us to use the CC-BY-SA, which is welcome news to me. Let's hear back from Spot on this question for Legal: "Is there any reason Fedora Documentation cannot dual-license or relicense all Fedora content including the wiki and fedoraproject.org under the CC-BY-SA?" - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41
Attachment:
pgpMMNTTYKYE9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
