On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:46:41PM +0000, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote: > Forgive my top post but this client is problematic. Gave up on > working with upstream to fix it. > > In the past when changes like this happened they were discussed and > an attempt to contact the people effected was made. This is the > problem and the most annoying point of this whole action item. I > don't care about the change in status, in fact I agree with it I > have not been able to be active in quite some time. I have been > trying to read the meeting minutes or summaries so that I can speak > up if needed or chip in for a very small task. Hopefully in this > calendar year things can get back to having more time to contribute. > > You know where to find me. I agree that teams should always put the communicate phase before the action phase. With a community that's so spread out and mostly populated by willing volunteers, the most effective way of doing that is getting something onto the mailing list. That way, transparency is preserved, and discussion can happen wherever needed. I'm sure that as the people working on this team get comfortable in their roles, there will be new and better ways to contribute and collaborate with each other. The Docs team always has been, and should remain, open to everyone to participate as little or as much as they wish. I'm certain Eric, John, Susan, David, and the other folks who have stepped up to lead this team will do their best to make that happen. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpJDOLrXH2Bz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
