On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:55:55AM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 12:23 +1000, Joshua Wulf wrote: > > Based on feedback on this list, I've put together a proposal for the > > Fedora Packaging Committee meeting. > > > > You can view it here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Publican_Documentation_Packages > > > > The intent of the proposal is to move forward on the bugs mentioned in > > it and get a raft of documents into the next release. > > > > Please let me know what you think. > > Opps... I hadn't caught up on posts made over the weekend before > posting the forward from Bugzilla. > > Thanks for writing up the proposal. It would be nice to have a > stream-lined validation process for Publican-created documents. > > I still have a concern about the product number in the package title. > Whether the FPC wants to accept it is one thing but I still feel that > Publican should provide support for NOT wanting it there in the first > place. There are guides out there that are obviously driven for a > specific version of Fedora and there are guides out there that aren't. > Those that aren't shouldn't have to have the product number. I must admit, seeing: fedora-documentation-guide-0-en_US looks weird to me. But it's not the end of the world either. > We are going to have to look at how we do the languages, too. We will > have to change the way we do business to make that happen properly. What specific changes are needed? (This is a good thread to lay them out.) -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpGewwwxhj7l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
