Re: Proposal for Implementing a Docbook Editor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:07:43PM +1000, Christopher Curran wrote:

> * Don't extend the spec. It is the downfall of most XML  
> editor/interpreter projects that the developers involved decide to add  
> substantial amounts of metadata or additional tags into the XML.

It would be reasonable to start with a specific subset of tags, right?
We could even do a minimized DTD, if that helps.

A few minutes work on the current set of documentation will tell us
which tags are currently used.  For example, I've never seen any of
the OO programming tags (<methodname>, etc.) used in Fedora Docs.

We don't have to limit the tagset forever, but it would give a smaller
scope for the early/first iterations, and it would follow the rule
suggested above about spec extension.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41

Attachment: pgpsutJ33UDXm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux