On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:51:40PM +1000, Christopher Curran wrote: > Christopher Curran wrote: >> Karsten Wade wrote: >>> * ACTION: quaid to work on the Fedora v. RHEL packaging >>> standards question -- are they equivalent or approximate. >>> >>> >>> >> Standards? Really? What about phpPgAdmin? or python-sexy? or >> perl-Net-LibIDN? or PyKDE4? >> >> Do they all follow the 'standards' too? Can I have a link to where the >> fedora standard is documented with rules prohibiting anything other >> than characters which don't work? >> > FYI: I am a fedora package maintainer, I'm interested to see where the > rules differ. I would like that link for further reference. I'm confused as to your actual question above. But in any case, the package review guidelines start here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpCTUthkJUco.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
