On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 11:41:32PM -0700, Clint Savage wrote: > > They are not required, but are a really good idea. It provides > logical separation when thinking about what a particular application > (in this case CMS) does. If we keep the same subdomain for all the > structures, we'd logically separate on uri's. Seems more logical to > me to have it be domains/subdomains as the logical divide. The key for me is consistency. Fedora Infrastructure and Websites teams decided on a sub-domain model some time ago. I think the real confusion is when it's a mix of sub-domain and nested folder structures. For this reason perhaps we should look at propagating wiki.fedoraproject.org instead -- as part of rebirthing it as a destination for contributors and other participants to be putting Fedora content. FWIW, the unique domain names are the ones that get me the most. I am always trying to ssh in to fedoraproject.org instead of fedorapeople.org, and recently I got crossed by separate mailman instances (is this true?) for lists.fedorahosted.org and lists.fedoraproject.org. - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41
Attachment:
pgpPiaMJzejay.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
