On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 11:32 -0500, David Nalley wrote: > Which brings me to the question - why are we languishing when it comes > to making this decision? Because I don't feel we haven't fully been able to articulate our reasons for wanting a CMS, and I think it would be premature to choose one particular CMS before deciding if *any* CMS is the proper solution. > We even regressed and talked about if/why we > need a CMS (and I am one of the guilty parties here) I'm probably the most guilty here, as I spent a lot of time last weekend trying to figure out how we get a CMS to handle various aspects of taking single-page HTML/multi-page (chunked) HTML/PDFs out of our DocBook toolchain and into a CMS in such a way that it's not a hack. If Zikula (or another CMS) already have provisions for this, then I'm happy to move forward. But based on the discussions both here on the list and in the IRC channel, I don't feel my questions have been adequately addressed. My 2 cents (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization)... -Jared -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
