On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:43:15AM -0500, Jared Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 00:28 +0800, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: > > How about rather than looking for an end-all be all solution, we find > > more than one tool that can all be used together. > > That brings up a very good point, and one that I didn't articulate well > in my last post: > > Have we defined an overall plan for how formal documents will be > written, edited, translated, and published? Is DocBook at the core > still a requirement? Most certainly, yes. Sorry about that confusion. > In other words, are we going to do the > wiki->DocBook->(Translate?)->XSLT->CMS->Edit->Publish dance? (wiki->)DocBook->Translate->XSLT->Publish Edit should be done before translating. :) > Or do we > expect the entire life-cycle of the document to live inside the CMS > system? IMO, our current purpose is not to replace the current document life-cycle. I have no expectations of what the future shall bring us. As I said, if having a Docs CMS brings in more writers and editors because they like and prefer to use the CMS, that is a good problem to have. I reckon we'll always need a high-quality toolchain underneath it all; currently DocBook XML does that, but DITA or similar could be in our future. - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41
Attachment:
pgpvpNQEyCn1G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
