Hi: > I think we should also be considering the other major players in the > CMS game, if there are people available to deploy and maintain them. > Drupal and Joomla! immediately come to mind, the latter especially > because it actually has some DocBook XML support. Features aren't > particularly compelling, though, if we have no one around to help with > the maintenance. +1 to your statement regarding maintenance. There are too many choices for CMS under three major platforms PHP, Python, JAVA, Ruby on rails etc., Enlisting some here that I have supported/ maintained: 1. JAVA based Apache Jackrabbit, Liferay 2. Python based Plone, Django framework 3. PHP based Mediawiki, Drupal, Wordpress, Joomla As Paul mentions, each of these CMS come with their own "features"/ "necessity for extension" which of course is based on what we need as a group as in, how to: - structure content - can be viewed from maintenance (or) usability perspective - involve volunteers - customize the framework - maintain - volunteer base and their associated knowledge of choice of platform - localization concerns Am still catching up on all IRC logs/ email archives so some of the listed were perhaps already reviewed and addressed :) > > None of this has any bearing on the quality of Zikula, which I'm sure > is excellent. Zikula looks cool indeed. -- Gayathri Swaminathan gpgkey: 3EFB3D39 Volunteer, FDP -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
