Hi, We some ambassadors are setting up another website for fedora (will be http://{bbs,wiki,news}.fedora-zh.org ). Current copyright and licese rules: * any contents belong to its author * on bbs any original contents must be licensed under OPL + CC(by-sa) * on news any original contents must be licensed under CC(by-sa) * on wiki all contents are in public domain What I want to know is: * should we ask the authors to assign copyright ownership to our organization? but we do not have an organization yet, and we don't have the effort of setting up a CLA (!) system. * the reason to use OPL is that I hope some content can be transfered to fedoraproject wiki without asking for more permission. Is it possible if we do not own those contents? * the reason to use CC(by-sa) is that the license is so popular. It seems fedoraproject suggests some contents to be CC-ed (artwork, videos) except for documents, why? * is there any conflict in our requirement that contents are licensed in both OPL and CC(by-sa)? * any other problems do you think? Thanks! -- bbbush ^_^ -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
