On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 12:26 +0000, Paul W. Frields wrote: > Is the a reason we don't want to claim this on f-docs-l once and for > all? I mean, it's not like our traffic here is overwhelming now. We > could simply say, "All wiki discussion --> f-docs-l," and ask people not > to cross-post that material. The example from Nigel was, "Do packagers and translators really want to read about using prompts in example commands?" I think the f-docs-l topic range is much wider than a wiki-specific list. I've kind-of felt the similar situation to what Nigel describes, not knowing where to go _and_ invite people as a definitive wiki discussion place that is not otherwise project specific. The fact we use the wiki as a documentation writing tool is sort-of coincidental. Another project could write all their docs in the Trac wiki, and if enough people cared, they might want a fedora-trac-list to talk about how to use Trac more effectively, etc. Part of this is that we have always made a separation of "requirements when writing for Fedora Docs" and "how to use the wiki as an effective writing tool". I still think that is a good separation. :) - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Community Gardener Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
