We have ourselves a good ol' fashioned disagreement, backed by a lack of guidelines and consistency! Let's have a closer look ... On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 18:12 -0400, Jason Taylor wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 22:55 -0700, Dale Bewley wrote: > > > > When describing new features of a release, should one describe the > > improvements between the feature as it existed at F9 release time or as it > > exists in the most recent F9 updates? I assume the former. > > Ideally, it would describe features as they differ from current release in its updated form. ... and ... On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 19:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Dale Bewley wrote: > > > > > When describing new features of a release, should one describe the > > improvements between the feature as it existed at F9 release time or as it > > exists in the most recent F9 updates? I assume the former. > > Release time is what we cover. That is we compare and note down details > that is different between Fedora 9 GA and what is expected in Fedora 10 GA. I would say ... sometimes we do one, sometimes the other, and we haven't been very strict. In general, the marketing approach is to talk about GA to GA. For documentation, I could see arguments either way. Dale - great question! Let's hash it out on list, set the guidance, and then you'll know. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Community Gardener Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
