That won't drive me away. As I said, I'm trying to figure out the lay
of the land here. Now I take it there is some documentation that is
considered Fedora documentation while other documentation is from other
organizations. I guess I presumed if it was accessible from "fedora"
via yum, it was considered Fedora documentation.
Thanks for the insight.
Chris
Sulyok Peti wrote:
2008. 06. 18, szerda keltezéssel 22.38-kor Chris Carlson ezt írta:
Given this background, I thought I could be of some use to the Fedora
documentation project. I'm not sure how much time I'll have, but I want
to help. I've already found a minor typo in the documentation for
glXIntro. The example program sets an attribute to GLX_DOUBLE_BUFFER,
but the symbol doesn't exist; it's now called GLX_DOUBLEBUFFER.
I do not want to drive you away, but this problem is not a Fedora Docs
issue. If you type
$ rpm -qif /usr/share/man/man3/glXIntro.3gl.gz
Name : mesa-libGL-devel Relocations: (not
relocatable)
Version : 7.1 Vendor: Fedora Project
Release : 0.31.fc9 Build Date: 2008. máj. 10.,
szombat, 07.43.18 CEST
Install Date: 2008. máj. 30., péntek, 18.39.24 CEST Build Host:
xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com
Group : Development/Libraries Source RPM:
mesa-7.1-0.31.fc9.src.rpm
Size : 938090 License: MIT
Signature : DSA/SHA1, 2008. máj. 28., szerda, 13.32.44 CEST, Key ID
b44269d04f2a6fd2
Packager : Fedora Project
URL : http://www.mesa3d.org
Summary : Mesa libGL development package
<<<<<<<<<<
So this doc belongs to http://www.mesa3d.org
|
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
