On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 10:11 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > This is on the Artwork list -- maybe Martin's work could be of use to > people in migrating our CVS documentation to individual hosted projects. > Git seems a little weird at first if you're really used to CVS and SVN, > but it's super powerful and pretty much everyone seems to be moving to > it now. +1 to declaring git the default Docs Project SCM. I'm brand-new with it, I still get stumbles, but it is clearly more useful than the CVS/SVN paradigm. I'd prefer to see *all* of our hosted books using the same SCM, to simplify training in Docs. Since we finally have the chance to abandon CVS, let's not do the half-step to SVN. We're not some enterprise constrained by process and archaic beliefs! Writer groups who start off a book on fedorahosted.org have the right to make their own choice, but a very strong recommendation of a specific SCM seems like a sane idea to me. (Then we can just debate the specific SCM.) ;-D - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
