On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 03:28 +0300, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm really sorry, but while committing my fi.po I also accidentally committed > > a new version of release-notes.pot. That happened because I didn't specify > > fi.po in the commit command. I didn't revert the change to prevent any more > > damage from happening. > > Yesterday I updated the file en_US/Kernel.xml with the (more correct) > kernel version. The plan was to update the PO files by hand after > translators were finished. It didn't occur to me that if anyone updated > their XML files and rebuilt locally, they could generate a new POT file. > > In hindsight, it would have been a good idea for me to announce the XML > change so people could ignore it. > > Now that we have a changed POT committed, what is the best thing to do > in terms of: > > * CVS best practice > * PO/POT best practice Looking at the stats [1], I think a personal email to the people who contributed relnotes in languages that went 99% (Spanish, Serbian) would make things look slick again. -d [1]: https://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/docs-release-notes -- Dimitris Glezos Jabber ID: glezos@xxxxxxxxxx, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B http://dimitris.glezos.com/ "He who gives up functionality for ease of use loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous) -- -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
