On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 12:27 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 18:58 +0900, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This brings up my next question. Is there a standard that we use like > > > when we work on the wiki? Like all info's will be 'x' and all warnings > > > 'y'? > > > > There are essentially two standards now, because of the way the wiki's > > DocBook conversion works as opposed to human readability. If you are > > writing a page that is drafted on the wiki but intended to go to CVS, > > the way to do an admonition is: > > > > [[Admonition("<type>", "<title>", "<brief_content>")]] > > > > For <type> you would subsitute the admonition type, such as "info," > > "warning," etc. This type of admonition looks terrible (basically it > > will look just like the text above in the viewed wiki page), but can be > > programmatically converted to DocBook when you choose that function on > > the wiki sidebar. > > Does that actually work in the 1.6 code? Nope, don't think it does: > > <para> > [[Admonition("note","x86 Kernel Includes Kdump","Both the x86_64 and the > i686 kernels are relocatable, so they no longer require a separate > kernel for kdump capability. PPC64 still requires a separate kdump > kernel.")]] > </para> > > The other day I told Murray to go ahead and make the pretty ones that > follow the actual wiki convention (more on this below). This is because > they look fine on the screen *and* they make a consistent output in the > XML that we can search for. > > > > The second way of doing it, which *cannot* be reliably converted but > > which looks good to wiki users: > > > > ||<tableclass="message <type>"> Put your content here. || > > > > The <type> here might be a little different -- I ran out of time to find > > the CSS style sheet that would probably give hints. > > That is a limited set created by Dimitris and does *not* have coverage > for all five of the DocBook admonition types. > > The actual proper method to follow right now, since it seems clear we > are converting to MediaWiki, is this method: > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/WikiEditing#Admonitions > > You know, unless I'm missing something ... :) > > > I think Paul changed my pretty ones back to the ugly ones, but that may have been because of all my unnecessary changes ;) Cheers, Murray. --------------------------------------------------------------------- pub 1024D/81B3FDEB 2007-09-19 [expires: 2008-09-18] Key fingerprint = 4ED9 9907 5BF0 4132 2B46 20D1 C0C6 362D 81B3 FDEB Murray McAllister (Fedora Docs Project / mdious) <murray.mcallister@xxxxxxxxx> sub 2048g/B04CFA0C 2007-09-19 [expires: 2008-09-18] -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list