Re: converting from the wiki to docbook

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 07:17 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 19:18 +0900, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 20:30 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 11:34 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: 
> > > > On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 19:31 +1000, Murray McAllister wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have marked the DNS guide edit-ready. So, it is not SUPER
> > > > > complete...but I'll only be adding a few little bits here and there,
> > > > > and I didn't want to hold everyone up with those.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sorry for not reading the wiki: is there anything more I'm supposed to
> > > > > do now, such as cleaning up the wiki > docbook conversion?
> > > > 
> > > > We could use a nifty table like the "Status of Edits" section on the
> > > > front of the DUG pages, to keep track of who is editing whatever.
> > > 
> > > Good thinking, that.  (As usual.)  I've made a skeleton at:
> > >   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/BeatStatus 
> > > 
> > > Clint was going to fill it in last I heard.
> > 
> > Does all of the beats need to be done by F9?
> 
> Of course!  These are the Release Notes, after all. ;-)


Great, so how do I transfer to xml etc.

Cheers,

Marc

-- 
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux