On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 09:23 +1000, Jeff Fearn wrote: > Jared Smith wrote: > > 1) Do we want the toolchain to be able to detect the version of FOP and > > adjust itself accordingly? > > This is probably the best approach, however different versions of FOP require > different configuration files and font metrics files. So we really want to keep > the number of supported version to a low number, like say 2 :) How about three+? This is because we have Fedora N, Fedora N-1, rawhide, and EPEL 5. I'm reckoning that you might want to see the a preferred version of fop in EPEL. We'll continue to need it working in the current, current-minus-one, and rawhide. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
