On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:39 +0000, Jonathan Roberts wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 13:26 -0800, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > > How does this outline look? > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KarstenWade/Drafts/OneSummary > > > > ... in trying to be inclusive for all the parts of the Project. > > I quite like the look of it but have a couple of questions: > > How does this fulfil the needs of the release notes - i.e. the more > technical content? Shucks, this is my fault. We have two things with the word "one" in their name, both under discussion: * One-sheet release notes for alpha, beta releases * OneSummary that provides a single source of summary for a release to distribute into final release notes, press kits, etc. I propose renaming OneSummary (it's the late comer). How about SingleSummary? SingleOverview? > Is there any point maintaining the distinction between the Release Notes > and the #/Summary? It is just that parts of a single-source summary are useful in the release notes; maybe even all of it. > Hmm that's all I can think for now :) I especially like the idea of > targeting Desktop/Server etc... So, with the new understanding, how does this proposal look for a single-sourced summary? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
