Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
Note: Subject changed from what must have been a typo. :) On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 13:39 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:THE PUNCHLINE: For its size, the Docs Project has done great things thanks to the energy and generosity of its members. But in the post-F9 era, we need to get off the treadmill of simple user/admin documentation, which is duplicated many times over in both the free and for-pay spheres, and move to goals that are more contributor-oriented.
<snip>
* We want to keep away from informal, end-user focused content. As Paul says, end-user-focused content is very common and hard to compete against. That doesn't mean we shouldn't try to produce useful end-usercontent.
It simply means that we have to have a reason to exist as a
It's funny and educational how things pan out from (or within) healthy projects with unintentionally accurate timing.project outside of just producing yet another set of Fedora how-to docs. * What we have that is unique is an inside view and understanding of how to contribute to Fedora. Sharing this knowledge is potentially much more valuable than sharing "How to do Foo."
I guess the expectations of what is DocsProject supposed to produce are bi-fold. People external to Fedora would mostly expect to find the guidelines for installing and using Fedora distribution.
This type of documentation is finally shaping up as complete and will be in the form that is not too difficult to maintain across release cycles, starting with f9.
We, who chose to do Fedora, on the other hand, are here with entirely different set of expectations. Thanks for reminding us about that and raising the bar.
Vladimir
- Karsten
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
