On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 18:06 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > My personal feeling is that the FAQ was great and indispensable when it > was created, back around FC3 when we were still trying to rally people > around all it could do. Plus, I think Karsten cut off a huge chunk of > time (of which he was already short) to put this together with some > other Red Hat principals like Dan, because he saw it was necessary to > get the info some publicity. +1 The SELinux FAQ was only intended to fill the gap of understanding at the time. For me, it was useful as a way to get ahead of the curve on the Red Hat SELinux Guide (for RHEL 4.) I vote we churn the FAQ into the compost pile, pull from it what is fertile, and move on to a fuller guide. The SELinux developers are interested in seeing that, I'd reckon. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
