Would it make sense to change our docs to refer to subkeys.pgp.net instead of MIT?
John -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: GPG Keysigning at FUDCon Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:43:54 -0500 From: Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx>Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxxReferences: <20071212214010.GA20896@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <477C3AA7.9010700@xxxxxxxxxx> <1199353983.13378.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <477D1646.6080207@xxxxxxxxxx>
John Poelstra wrote:
I looked into it more and changed the expiration by: 1) gpg --edit <key> and then option "expire" 2) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --send-keys <key> to make change public
FWIW, you may want to send that to subkeys.pgp.net, which is where
Matt plans to pull the keys from for the key signing. This is the
default keyserver in recent gnupg releases. I think that there is a
sync between pgp.mit.edu and subkeys.pgp.net, but I'm not positive.
The gnupg default is subkeys.pgp.net because pgp.mit.edu runs ancient
keyserver software that has many known problems (it ignores photo
packets, can munge up multiple subkeys, and other annoyances).
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I do nothing, granted. But I see the hours pass - which is better than
trying to fill them.
-- E. M. Cioran
Attachment:
file:///tmp/nsmail-1.tmp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
