On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 14:09 +1300, Vladimir Kosovac wrote: > > Marc Wiriadisastra wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 16:18 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > >> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 23:22 +0900, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote: > >>> There is (IMO) some overlap between the > >>> Admin guide and the Desktop one and there will always be so with that > >>> thought should we transfer some topics across? > >> What is the overlap you see? > >> > >> - Karsten > > > > Yum and user administration I would think? > > > > Since there is/was system-config-users which is the gui side but it's > > possibly an admin tool. > > I don't think this stuff is out-of-place in a DUG. To teach people new > to Fedora how to use PC effectively, basic system administration should > be included. Probably just a matter of figuring the right amount of > information. John posted earlier with reasons why these subjects all belong in the Administration Guide, not the DUG. If someone needs to "administer" their system to make basic use of it, that's a *bug*. Whether a tool is GUI or not has no bearing on it being included in one guide or another; in fact, a good case could be made that almost *nothing* non-GUI should be in the Desktop User Guide. The AG should, in fact, prefer GUI tools to hand-editing configuration files whenever possible. This is part of the "best practices" for which we should shoot. Where the GUI tools are deficient, the basic use cases should be the first covered, using the GUI tools, and the more advanced or infrequent use cases requiring other admin interactions should follow. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
