Op maandag 03-12-2007 om 12:27 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Karsten Wade: > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 19:39 +0100, Bart Couvreur wrote: > > > One thing, I'm wondering about: do we really need 7 people aboard FDSCo? > > Looking at the attendees to meetings the last couple of months, we've > > done about almost everything with 4-5 max. > > Starting from this discussion on IRC[1], I think we do still need enough > people to cover when others are not available. Otherwise, sure, it > could all be done with a minimally sized leadership. > > However, I don't think we can so easily change these details at this > point. The reason we have a review of these details/policies *after* > the election is to be fair and equitable: > > * The three seats up for (re)election would reduce get reduced to "one", > which is not encouraging for potential nominees. > > * Electing three people now is for a twelve month term, but after the > elections the new FDSCo could vote to shorten that term to six months > and hold elections for a new, smaller body in May. > > * Mainly, we said we would follow this pattern and switching this late > is not a good time to switch; wisely, the previous FDSCo created the > trigger to discuss changes to the policy for *after* this election, just > to avoid (the appearance of) election improprieties. > > Thus, I think the entire policy is up for discussion after the election, > including how long all active seats are held, etc. > > - Karsten Fair play, just something we need to keep in mind later on. Carry on, Bart -- Bart <couf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <couf@xxxxxxxxx> key fingerprint: 6AAB 544D 3432 D013 776D 3602 ADB6 6B2A D93F 0F93
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
