On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 10:19 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 12:16 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > Not really, I guess. We should also note that there are Plone modules > > available for wiki functionality if they're really needed, although > > honestly the Plone document writing tools are as easy and inviting as > > the wiki tools, only better. I have no idea what the ETA of the new > > workflow stuff is. > > The part you aren't considering is that the Docs workflow is access > controlled. Just anyone cannot drop in and work on it without going > through the join-the-project steps. The wiki is different, culturally > and programmatically. > > I'd suspect that most on-team writers would stop using the wiki, but we > still need to be open for contributions from the entirety of the Fedora > Project in places such as Docs/Beats/. > > The fact is, there are going to be some docs that will never leave the > wiki because the subject matter expert doesn't want to work on it in > another location. *Maybe* we can get them to work it as a normal > workflow Plone document, but not likely to get that xhtml => xml-in-SCM > that our custom workflow is for. Is it possible, even with our workflow, to allow the community to edit something in Plone under Docs/Beats (or whatever namespace this becomes), without the changes immediately being published? This is a question to which maybe we don't know the answer. I would love someone Plone-knowledgeable to explain it without launching into undefined jargon. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
