On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 13:11 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I fear my blurting out something that came to mind has made me seem a > little too much like an agent provocateur. But in essence, this is > indeed what I meant: that with the few hands we have, perhaps we're best > served by eliminating as much administration as possible, to the extent > it frees up resources/time. You are right, I picked up on this as a theme and a way to get a conversation going. We just have overly-stretched leaders, but the project itself is healthy. As I'm trying to renew *all* the commitments in my life that have been suffering over the months, I want to be sure that each one still needs me and what I have to offer. Also, I think it's good to have a strong leader for an important project like this one. I just want to make sure there is room in this garden to grow other leaders. When there are too few of us, we spread ourselves thin, and it acts like a mulch that suppresses the growth of other leaders. It's a bizarre and ironic effect. A solution is to rip ourselves up from doing tasks, thereby making room for someone else to do that task, get the nourishment, and grow. Therefore, elections *and* a review of who is doing what are both very useful right now. Let us proceed. - Karsten "Onward!" - Sacha Labourey -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
