Op maandag 11-06-2007 om 15:56 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Paul W. Frields: > On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 07:56 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > > I find myself in solo control of our two FDP mailing lists (this one and > > f-docs-commits). My practice is to always make sure that I have another > > mail list admin listed. > > > > I'm wondering, could we just make the rule, "All FDSCo members are named > > admins and have the shared password for all FDP lists"? > > > > The downside is the continuous "post by non-member" notices one > > receives, and if they get annoying, a simple filter makes them go away. > > I also try to go in once every few weeks and clear out the pending admin > > tasks, which are always about a mass delete of held-for-approval spam. > > The downside's not too steep. I think I'm on f-dsco-l admin roster > (which represents slightly >0 work now) ;-) so I don't mind helping with > this too. Putting all of FDSCo on this makes sense. > Yeah, I'm okay with it and it does make sense to me somehow. BTW: Shouldn't we just kill f-dsco-l? Or do we need to keep the old logs of meetings? Bart -- Bart <couf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <couf@xxxxxxxxx> key fingerprint: 6AAB 544D 3432 D013 776D 3602 ADB6 6B2A D93F 0F93
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
