On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 09:16 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 18 April 2007 20:54:30 Paul W. Frields wrote: > > So, make a suggestion for fixing it then! :-) We could move our > > timetable for final PO as long as it's OK by Jesse and RelEng. I'm > > cc'ing him on this to get a call for how late he can reasonably take > > release notes material, and we can go by that. > > I can take release notes content pretty late in the process, so long as we all > know it's good. A day or two after the final freeze even. OK, I already have the schedule marked to deliver f-r-n on the freeze date, so this means you're only giving us an extra day or two. Don't take that as a complaint -- I understand the remainder of the time is for testing, disc manufacturing, and so forth. So "feature list fuzziness" or no, AFAICT the schedule we've got up is very reasonable, based on the release engineering schedule. We still can do an additional update of release notes for Web only, which may not be marked yet on that schedule. Any guides merely need to be in place by release date. Given Jesse's statement above and the need to have a day or two of allowance, I think our schedule can stand as is. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
