Meh, there is always going to be bias, people use one thing more than another they are more prone to document on it. Granted as a whole we should try and avoid tunnel vision on a particular software package(s) but it is bound to happen to a degree and these docs are still, even after publication as I understand it, living documents. So we fine tune what we have and plan additions etc. and move on just like anything else.. :) -Jason On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 05:17 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Paul W. Frields wrote: > > http://distrocenter.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/03/13/1919208 > > > > Contributors to the DUG: > > > > 1. Read. > > 2. Cry/wail/gnash teeth. > > 3. Ingest. > > 4. Discuss. > > 5. Fix. > > Want a more spicy "review"? > > http://beranger.org/index.php?article=2452 > > Rahul >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
