On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 21:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Which is why I said that individual developers need to be more proactive > on passing on important upstream as well as Fedora specific changes. Any > single person doing it is going to be painful. +1 It is a SERIOUS problem that Fedora developers, for the most part, do not make any content changes in Docs/Beats/. The space has been there for months, they could be making continual notes in public about their section of the release, but they do not. We are missing a big opportunity here. I think FDP is doing all it can to move this forward. I escalated the problem to the board. When it is this easy[1] to file a release note, there is simply no excuse not to do it. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/ReleaseNotes/Process#submitting > I think we are aiming at a different audience for each of the test > releases. We need to agree on and pass on that to the wider folks involved. +1 ... about time we do that. Make it very clear in the announcement: test1 -- for developers, use at your own risk, contains many half-baked items test2 -- for early adopters, most things should work and we REALLY NEED YOUR HELP to find what is broken test3 -- for beta users, this is the place where we MUST HAVE full community participation; otherwise, when it is released and doesn't work on our hardware, it is you who suffers the most. Like that? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
