On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 08:48 +0300, John Babich wrote: > On 12/19/06, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What, exactly, did you experience or observe? I have the first usage in > > my /etc/yum.conf and it works. I just did a "yum clean all" and > > everything worked as expected with my squid proxy. (I am tunneling it > > through SSH, but that shouldn't matter in this case.) > > > This is where it gets tricky. I guess the good thing about filing a bug report > is that, if done correctly, the filer should verify the bug and explain the > context in as much detail as possible. Yes, to the meta-point in this discussion, this is the advantage of filing a bug report. We could add the yum developer to resolve the question, for example. Attach patches of suggested fixes, such as admonition that covers your situation. Etc. But how do we cover this in the case of e.g. one writer and another needing to discuss and dispute technical content? Our workflow should allow for informal channels of discussion, and give some suggestions about when to break out of informality into something more formal (difficult to use) but useful (can drag in more people). Also, informal discussions should probably happen on-list, so we all benefit/critique. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
