On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 12:52 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Vladimir Kosovac wrote: > > Greetings, Motley Crew! > > > > I have couple of sandboxed pages ready for your review/input at: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/wiki/VladimirKosovac/StylingPage/WorkPage > > > > As Karsten suggested, probably easier to review smaller chunks - thus > > this call. Of course, all suggestions are welcome and appreciated. > > I would like to see how this section fits into the bigger guide. So > using the drafts space seems to be better. Do we follow the style of > exposing path and binary names anywhere as compared to highlighting the > menu entries in the desktop? This section would be good as a reference. > However a guide should cover tools from the administrative view point > and not just lump all the system-config* tools in a single page. > > For example, if I am doing web services administration, I would expect > to learn about system-config-httpd in that section along with the Apache > configuration details. That's an excellent point Rahul makes -- that our documentation should be largely task-based. Relevant material should be lumped together where possible and logical. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Docs Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
