Dan Smith wrote:
I know I'm supposed to submit to the wiki but I am having a great deal
of trouble with it not recognizing my key. Still not sure why. I've
exported it. Then created a new one. Anyway I've had this sitting around
for a couple weeks now ready and would like to get feedback on it and
hopefully get it submitted to the Wiki by somebody with edit writes
while I work on getting my account straitened out. Once I get reamed on
a couple of these for mistakes in style I'll have a very good idea of
what is and isn't wanted in documentation and can hopefully just submit
in a normal fashion by then.
Instead of restating large portions of what basically amounts to a
description of the FHS, it would be much more useful to refer to FHS and
then state the exceptions and more Fedora specific directories and files
and describe them in more detail.
We insist on following FHS as part of our packaging guidelines at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-e1c5548cbbe551c7a43d375c524ab2ea0188557e
. The exception with is libexecdir has also been submitted for inclusion
in the next revision of FHS. So directories like /selinux and files like
/etc/fedora-release etc should be documented better and the rest should
left to FHS as the canonical description of the Fedora directory and
filesystem structure.
Rahul
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
