LOL!!
Sorry, I'm been reading too much industry news lately.
Please substitute the acronym DUG for FUD in my last posting.
John Babich
On 11/28/06, John Babich <jmbabich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/28/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The documentation team needs to carefully look at the effects of this
> proposal - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraSummit/ReleaseProcess.
> Modularizing content the same way the packages are done allowing people
> to somehow specify "dependencies" might work.
I agree that we need to avoid a monolithic document. We should continue
to produce specific modules (GNOME, KDE, Xfce) which can perhaps be
dynamically linked to produce a custom doc (for instance, FUD with a KDE
flavor).
How to do it still escapes me. Perhaps using INCLUDEs with some scripting
would do the trick.
John Babich
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
