On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 10:15 +0530, Chidananda Jayakeerti wrote: > I feel at home with vi for docbook and wouldn't mind a better tool to > edit documents. Currently I use vi to edit docbook documents and use > the docbook utils to convert them to the necessary formats. Using vi > and rendering with docbook-tools is laborious and time consuming. > > I'm curious about the development environment of other writers as well > and wonder if there are any better tools/methods for document > generation. Most of the senior editors around here use Emacs and psgml. We have a complete toolchain for rendering documents into HTML so you can check output in your favorite Web browser. We can take original composition in other forms, but since the canonical IG is already in DocBook in our CVS, it really makes more sense to work on it there. If we have a team willing to work in DocBook and in CVS, and they do the necessary work to get a CVS account (CLA, etc.), I will be happy to sponsor them and we can simply restrict access to the installation-guide module for now. As an aside, plain text messages to the list are appreciated since HTML throws a lot of Linux email clients for a loop. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Docs Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
