Re: release notes ready for translation (FC6 test2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:02 +0200, Thomas Canniot wrote:

> I checked the new pot file and i think it is useless to lose time
> changing all the "Fedora Core" strings to "Fedora Core 6 test2". That
> means that there will be a new issue for the release note with a new
> modification to "Fedora Core 6 test2". 
> 
> Why not to write it plain "Fedora Core 6", as it is our main goal, and
> that release notes for test version are just kind of drafts ?

The release notes are actually specific to the test version they go
with.

We have had situations where the content is only relevant for that test
release, and changes for the next test.

However, there certainly must be a better way.  Are we unable to use an
ENTITY or XInclude?  I forgot the status of that technique.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux