On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 14:17 +0000, Adam Moreland wrote: > NTFS, guide could still be done then, if written correctly, am i right in > assuming this?? I think i need help, before ploughing into documentation, > with such complex legal, or patent encumbered policies, and apologies for > the seemingly rediculous arguements i have amde, it is simply just not > enough to have aone or two docs on the subject, we need guides and > recomendations on where to get this stuff (native drivers i mean) and if > they are shippe,d how to active them. Speaking only for NTFS and an official FDP doc, I would say this should wait, just until we have a decision on the driver inclusion issue. Note that, as Patrick mentioned before, nothing stops you from working on this with a non-official group such as Fedora Unity. I don't think anyone can guarantee for you that your work could be made official until we have a decision on the main issue, which is including the NTFS kernel module itself. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
