Re: OPL relicensing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 20:09 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 10:33 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > Hi FDPers,
> > 
> > I was looking at the Translation QSG and it appears that it's still
> > licensed as GNU FDL.  I show the following contributors to the document:
> > 
> > Manuel Ospina
> > José Nuno Coelho Sanarra Pires
> > Francesco Tombolini
> > Hugo Cisneiros
> > Andrew Martynov
> > 
> > Could each of you check in here on fedora-docs-list, and verify that you
> > give permission to relicense this document as OPL?  Thank you and sorry
> > for the bother.
> 
> The CLA allows relicensing without asking each and every contributor
> explicit permission. It can be done as a matter of courtesy but its not
> a legal requirement.

Ah, you're right Rahul.  Thanks for reminding me.  I always like to be
super-careful about not stepping on legal toes.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux