On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 10:40 -0400, Debbie Deutsch wrote: > Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > > A "choosing your release" section sounds like not only a good > > compromise, but a good acknowledgement of the issues that might > > otherwise confuse new users. Although I think "older release, fewer > > bugs" is kind of a red herring, given the usability strides I mentioned > > previously, one of the keys to making this document attain its goal is > > to at least confront some of the more "mythical" issues that swirl > > around at release time. Perhaps gathering some of these from the Fedora > > Forum would be a good thing...? > > > > > Are you suggesting that one of us explicitly pose that question in the > forum? The results might be interesting, especially if the thread did > not degenerate into ranting. Given the probability of that "if" becoming "when," no... ;-D *But* it could be worthwhile to at least scan through the topics list from the last month (i.e. since FC5 release), and compare to the month following FC4 release, to see if there are any recurrences. In all seriousness, memory being what it is, this is a case where archives are better at doing one's bidding! :-) -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
