Re: Coreutils POSIX changes not documented in release notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Uttered Tommy Reynolds <Tommy.Reynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:

> Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:
> > On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 14:07 -0500, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> > > I was all excited about upgrading some servers to FC5, and this stops
> > > that upgrade cold until every one of hundreds of locally written scripts,
> > > some two decades old, are audited and "fixed."
> Doesn't belong in release notes; this is an application porting
> issue.  Release Notes is not for migration topics, but differences
> from the FC{n-1} version.
> Upgraders, si!  Migrators, no!
> NOTABUG is my position.

Although differences in the POSIXLY_CORRECT handling from a prior
version would be perfectly apropos.

-- 
I'm already an anomaly, I shall soon be an anachronism, and I have
every intention of dying an abuse!

Attachment: pgpBR07M3FCN1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux