On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 18:19 -0300, Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > Uttered "Hugo Cisneiros" (eitch) <fedora-docs-commits@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > >>Modified Files: > >> entities-it.ent entities-it.xml > >>Log Message: > >>added pt_BR translations > > > > > > I hope the 'pt_BR' log message was a typo for this "it" Italian file! > > Dunno what happened, I updated my tree with "cvs up", *only added and > changed pt_BR files*, and did a "cvs ci -m 'added pt_BR translations". > Looks like I grabbed new -it files from the "cvs up" and commited by > accident. > > I realized (quaid told me in IRC) how I could commit all files that I > modified to the CVS: stripping the filenames in the cvs ci last > argument. It was the first time I used this approach :) Is it a bad habit? My vote is, "Yes." In fact, before I do a commit, I do a "cvs diff <filenames...>" to see what exactly I'm going to be committing. If you leave out the file names, the same rules apply, it will be recursive from your current directory. This is a good way of doing "check yourself before you wreck yourself." > Looks like because of this I will back to specifying the files manually > instead of letting cvs decide what's to commit or not... > > Sorry ;) The great thing about CVS is that most harm is undoable, and I doubt this was a big deal. It may partly be obviated by my next post in the entities thread. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
