On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 10:19 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > If fdp-info-*.xml is a generated file (right?) should we -not- check a > > version into CVS? When the rpm-info.xml is present, the fdp-info file > > is created from that, right? > > That is correct. The "fdp-info-*.xml" files are generated and should > not be checked into CVS. > > If make(1) complains about not finding an "fdp-info-*.xml" file, > there is something wrong with "Makefile.common". > > AIUI, stickster was helping with this. If you get this answer and > it's still broken, let me know and I'll investigate. Yup, on the case. (For whatever that's worth.) I noticed this at checkout this morning and will remove the offending files if Karsten hasn't done so already. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
