On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 07:05 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > If fdp-info-*.xml is a generated file (right?) should we -not- check a > version into CVS? When the rpm-info.xml is present, the fdp-info file > is created from that, right? BTW, I ask because make(1) is complaining about the rpm-info-en.xml file missing: make html make: *** No rule to make target `/home/kwade/Documents/projects/fedora/cvs-docs/release-notes/en/rpm- info-en.xml', needed by `en/fdp-info-en.xml'. Stop. The file is not in the repo: cvs up -d en/rpm-info-en.xml cvs update: nothing known about en/rpm-info-en.xml I copied over the Italian version (my best chance of translating back, as it's closest to Spanish). I figure that this was just a slip in the process of moving files around, just want to make sure I'm not missing something. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Content Services Fedora Documentation Project http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
