On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 09:57 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > So, doesn't this mean we need to be canonical for the .po files? > > release-notes/en/*-en.xml > > release-notes/en/po/*.po > > When do you want this partitioning into subdirs to take place? If we do it immediately, we may be able to get the release notes into the translation system for test3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179799 > I don't see the necessity for subdir'ing the .po files unless that is > the expected convention. Is it? No idea, just a proposal. Sure, then can live side-by-side with the XML. If we were all on the same CVS, we could let trans hold the .po files. Unfortunately, we're not, and by the time we are, we'll just continue to host the translations. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Content Services Fedora Documentation Project http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
