On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 18:22 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > > If I read the signs aright, the > > > http://www.w3.org/2003/XInclude > > > namespace has been depreciated in favor of the > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude > > > namespace. > > > Is that correct? > > That is how I read it from this page: > > http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/ModularDoc.html > > Gack. A real case of YMMV, I guess. > > It's a pity that the DocBook DTD won't let you put the xmlns:xi="..." > declaration just anywhere. Requiring that whole <xi:include > href="..." xmlns:xi="..."/> declaration every time is clumsy. > > Oh, well, these things happen. Not only that, but ... doesn't this make it impossible to validate or build the document when unable to reach that URI? We might make it a policy of using a copy of the 2001/XInclude within docs-common/common. I don't see a local copy of it within Fedora. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Content Services Fedora Documentation Project http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list