Re: Reference for XIncludes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 18:22 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:
> 
> > > If I read the signs aright, the 
> > > 	http://www.w3.org/2003/XInclude
> > > namespace has been depreciated in favor of the
> > > 	http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude 
> > > namespace.
> > > Is that correct?
> > That is how I read it from this page:
> > http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/ModularDoc.html
> 
> Gack.  A real case of YMMV, I guess.
> 
> It's a pity that the DocBook DTD won't let you put the xmlns:xi="..."
> declaration just anywhere.  Requiring that whole <xi:include
> href="..." xmlns:xi="..."/> declaration every time is clumsy.  
> 
> Oh, well, these things happen.

Not only that, but ... doesn't this make it impossible to validate or
build the document when unable to reach that URI?

We might make it a policy of using a copy of the 2001/XInclude within
docs-common/common.  I don't see a local copy of it within Fedora.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
Content Services                          Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux