On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 08:32 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" (pfrields) <fedora-docs-commits@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > - REVDATE=`date +"%Y-%M-%d"` > > + REVDATE=`date +"%Y-%m-%d"` > > While I realize that the RPM-mandated date string "%s %b %d %Y" will > not sort very well, at least it won't mess up the RPM changelog. > Shouldn't we be using that for this insert command? The script sets the date format for an rpm @date to "%a %b %d %Y", and the date format for a doc @date as above. I don't really mind if we use the same thing for both, but it would be really cool if, whatever we use, we could figure out a way of checking sanity on it. (On the other hand, that may only be a problem for rpm-info files that are created right now from the doc revisionhistory elements, since new ones, where the maintainers use "make clog", will simply Work Right.) If you'd like to change this to have them all work the same, I'm OK with that; DocBook doesn't dictate a date format so it all comes out in the wash. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
