Re: install-guide rpm-info.xml,1.2,1.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:

> re: Commit below --
> 
> On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:04 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > Dates must be in ctime(3) format, not ISO format.
> > TODO: We need an XSL magic to translate the dates if they have dashes.

I added the "fdpsh" command "iso2date YYYY-MM-DD" or "iso2date today"
to make this easier.
 
> The "make clog" target takes care of this automatically.  I would
> recommend folks using that target whenever possible since it minimizes
> hassle.  If you edit manually, well, just respect the normal rules for
> such things.  If you break the revision's @date attribute, the rpmbuild
> process will tell you what you did wrong (i.e. %changelog date is not in
> proper format).

All dates in the "rpm-info.xml" file should be in the ctime(3)
format, instead of some as ISO and others not.  We just don't really
care about the revision date on the doc.  Yet.
 
> Since no one will be creating rpm-info.xml files that have any RPM
> revisions yet, there shouldn't be any cruft to worry about.

Well, I'm testing the RPM build structure on a second document ;-)
I'm not really sure how this "rpm-info.xml" was produced, though.

As you say, no need to worry.  In fact, I only worry about those
things which I control: therefore, I never worry about anything.

Cheers

Attachment: pgpVl0dKSwYL5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux