On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 12:39 -0500, Tim Burke wrote: > I hope you all had a great holiday. Sorry for the delay, and a sincere > thanks to all who participated in the survey. The results of this > survey are hung off the fedoraproject.org marketing page under a > feedback section. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/Fedora I would highly recommend all DocMonkeys check out the results -- at least the summary -- listed on the URL above. Of special concern for us: A. "Improve documentation and release notes" was priority #3 on the list of 12, right behind "Improve overall stability" and "Implement new features." B. Documentation appeared on the performance list in position #11 of 11. Yikes. 161 responses considered documentation performance as "strong good to excellent," while 277 called it "poor." Certainly we all know that we're hampered somewhat by a lower level of involvement from the community than, say, Fedora Extras. But surely we have made and can continue to make improvements. Let the discussion commence! I think this should be on our agenda for today's FDSCo meeting if possible, so some initial responses can make it to the minutes posted here later tonight/tomorrow. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
