On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 15:27 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Paul, > > + <xsl:for-each select="/rpm-info/copyright"> > + <xsl:element name="copyright"> > + <xsl:for-each select="/rpm-info/copyright/year"><xsl:element name="year"> > + <xsl:value-of select="node()"/> > + </xsl:element></xsl:for-each> > + <xsl:for-each select="/rpm-info/copyright/holder"> > + <xsl:element name="holder"> > + <xsl:value-of select="node()"/> > + </xsl:element> > + </xsl:for-each> > + </xsl:element> > + </xsl:for-each> > > This is a bit verbose. Embedding so much of each element's path here > can be detrimental to maintainability. The <xsl:for-each> cycles > through the available /rpm-info/copyright/ elements, setting the > symbol "." or node() to the element currently getting the "focus", so > you could write this as: > > <xsl:for-each select="/rpm-info/copyright"> > <xsl:element name="copyright"> > <xsl:for-each select="year"> > <xsl:value-of select="."/> > </xsl:for-each> > </xsl:element> > </xsl:for-each> > > HTH. Actually, I thought the same thing before my commit, WRT the absolute element path, then promptly forgot to go back and change it. Thanks for catching this. The node() thing I didn't realize was an issue. Are there any usage differences between "node()" and "."? -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
