On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 11:41 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Documents built locally from CVS can never be "production" because > they are not official copies. To emphasis this, we now have a > watermark indicating its draft status. > > Documents obtained from DocsRawHide can never be "production" and > need to be watermarked as draft. > We really need only one CSS stylesheet in the docs CVS: the > fedora-draft.css file, and we have that. > > Any official-looking document renderings should come from whom ever > is constructing the official-looking release, but anything in our CVS > is strictly for draft documents. I agree. This is in line with the general trademark policy, too (people can freely copy, modify, and then rebrand, but not pass off modified copies as an "official Fedora" product). -- Stuart Ellis stuart@xxxxxxxx Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/ GPG key ID: 7098ABEA GPG key fingerprint: 68B0 E291 FB19 C845 E60E 9569 292E E365 7098 ABEA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
